Devry University's False Advertising Scandal: Uncovering The Truth

DeVry University faced significant scrutiny and legal consequences for false advertising in 2016 when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit against the institution. The FTC alleged that DeVry had misled prospective students with deceptive claims about graduate employment rates and income levels, stating that 90% of graduates found jobs in their fields within six months and earned 15% more than graduates from other colleges. Investigations revealed these claims were unsubstantiated, leading to a $100 million settlement in 2017, which included $49 million in student debt relief. This case marked a pivotal moment in holding for-profit colleges accountable for misleading marketing practices and highlighted broader concerns about transparency in higher education.

Explore related products

The Santa Scandal: From the Journal of the Holiday Kings - Entry 1

$5.99

The True Summit

$3.99

Deceptive Enrollment Practices: Misleading students about job placement rates and salary expectations after graduation

In 2016, DeVry University faced a reckoning when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit alleging deceptive advertising practices. The core accusation? DeVry had misled prospective students with exaggerated claims about job placement rates and post-graduation salaries. This wasn't just a minor exaggeration; the FTC found that DeVry's advertisements were fundamentally flawed, painting a rosier picture than reality allowed.

For instance, DeVry's "90% of graduates actively seeking employment landed jobs in their field within six months" claim was debunked. The FTC revealed that the actual rate was significantly lower, and many graduates struggled to find jobs aligned with their degrees. This discrepancy wasn't a mere oversight; it was a calculated strategy to entice students with promises of lucrative careers, regardless of the actual outcomes.

The lawsuit also exposed DeVry's manipulation of salary data. Their advertisements boasted that graduates earned 15% more than those with only a high school diploma. However, this comparison was misleading, as it failed to account for crucial factors like prior work experience and the specific fields of study. In reality, many DeVry graduates found themselves burdened with student loan debt and earning salaries comparable to, or even lower than, those of non-graduates in similar fields.

This case highlights a disturbing trend in for-profit education: the prioritization of enrollment numbers over student success. DeVry's deceptive practices preyed on vulnerable individuals seeking better career prospects, luring them with false promises and leaving them saddled with debt and dashed hopes.

The DeVry case serves as a stark reminder for prospective students to approach marketing materials with a critical eye. Don't be swayed by flashy statistics or glowing testimonials. Dig deeper, research independently, and seek out unbiased information about job placement rates and salary expectations for your chosen field. Remember, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Accreditation Misrepresentation: Falsely claiming programs were accredited by recognized bodies to attract students

DeVry University's false advertising scandal hinged heavily on accreditation misrepresentation. In 2016, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged DeVry with deceiving prospective students by falsely claiming its graduates enjoyed significantly higher employment rates and salaries than graduates from other colleges. This wasn't just about puffery; DeVry specifically touted its business program as being accredited by the prestigious Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). This accreditation, a gold standard in business education, was a powerful magnet for students seeking a reputable degree. However, the FTC found that DeVry's accreditation claim was misleading, as it applied only to a small fraction of its business programs, not the entirety as implied.

Devry's tactic exploited a fundamental trust students place in accreditation. Accreditation by recognized bodies signifies a program meets established standards of quality, ensuring graduates possess the knowledge and skills employers seek. By falsely claiming widespread AACSB accreditation, DeVry created a false sense of security, luring students into programs that might not have met the rigorous standards they were led to believe. This wasn't just about attracting students; it was about attracting students willing to pay a premium for what they believed was a superior education.

The consequences of such misrepresentation are far-reaching. Students who enrolled based on DeVry's false claims may have graduated with degrees that held less weight in the job market than promised. They may have incurred substantial student loan debt, believing their DeVry degree would lead to lucrative careers. The FTC's $100 million settlement with DeVry, which included debt relief for affected students, underscores the severity of the harm caused by this accreditation deception.

This case serves as a stark reminder for prospective students to scrutinize accreditation claims. Don't simply take an institution's word for it. Verify accreditation status directly with the accrediting body. The U.S. Department of Education maintains a database of accredited institutions and programs, providing a reliable resource for students to confirm a program's legitimacy. Remember, accreditation is a crucial indicator of quality, but it's only meaningful when it's genuine.

Loan Scam Allegations: Encouraging students to take out loans with false promises of career success

In 2016, DeVry University faced a reckoning when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit alleging the institution had engaged in deceptive advertising practices. At the heart of the case were claims that DeVry had lured students into taking out substantial loans by falsely promising superior career outcomes and higher salaries compared to graduates from other institutions. The FTC’s investigation revealed that DeVry’s advertisements, which boasted 90% of graduates found jobs in their field within six months, were not only misleading but entirely unsubstantiated. This case exposed a systemic issue: the exploitation of students’ aspirations through predatory loan schemes disguised as pathways to success.

Consider the mechanics of this scam. DeVry’s marketing materials targeted vulnerable populations—often first-generation college students or those seeking career changes—with glossy brochures and online ads promising guaranteed success. Prospective students were told that a DeVry degree would lead to high-paying jobs, justifying the hefty tuition costs. However, the reality was starkly different. Many graduates found themselves burdened with insurmountable debt and unable to secure the jobs they were promised. The loans, often backed by the federal government, ensured DeVry profited regardless of student outcomes, while graduates were left to navigate financial ruin.

The FTC’s lawsuit against DeVry resulted in a $100 million settlement, one of the largest in the history of for-profit education. Of this, $49 million was allocated for student loan forgiveness, providing some relief to those who had been misled. However, the settlement underscored a broader issue: the lack of accountability in the for-profit education sector. DeVry’s practices were not an isolated incident but part of a pattern where institutions prioritized profit over student success. This case serves as a cautionary tale for prospective students to scrutinize claims made by educational institutions, particularly those tied to financial commitments.

To avoid falling victim to similar scams, students should adopt a critical approach when evaluating educational opportunities. First, verify any claims about job placement rates or graduate salaries through independent sources, such as the U.S. Department of Education’s College Scorecard. Second, compare tuition costs with potential earnings in the chosen field to ensure the investment is financially viable. Third, seek out alumni testimonials and reviews to gauge the institution’s reputation. Finally, consider federal student aid options carefully, understanding the long-term implications of loan repayment. By taking these steps, students can protect themselves from predatory practices and make informed decisions about their education.

The DeVry case highlights the need for regulatory reforms to prevent such scams. While the FTC’s intervention provided some justice, it also revealed gaps in oversight that allowed DeVry to operate unchecked for years. Strengthening accountability measures, such as requiring institutions to provide transparent data on student outcomes and imposing stricter penalties for false advertising, could deter similar practices in the future. Ultimately, the DeVry scandal is a reminder that education should empower, not exploit, and that students deserve protection from those who would profit from their dreams.

Graduation Rate Inflation: Overstating graduation rates to appear more successful than reality

DeVry University faced significant scrutiny in 2016 when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit alleging deceptive advertising practices. Among the claims was the accusation that DeVry falsely inflated its graduation rates to attract prospective students. This practice, known as *graduation rate inflation*, involves overstating the percentage of students who complete their degrees, creating a misleading picture of institutional success. By touting a 90% graduation rate for certain programs—a figure later debunked as closer to 58%—DeVry positioned itself as a high-achieving institution, enticing students with the promise of better outcomes than competitors.

Analyzing this tactic reveals a broader trend in higher education marketing: institutions often manipulate data to enhance their appeal. Graduation rates are a critical metric for students evaluating colleges, as they correlate with job placement and return on investment. DeVry’s strategy exploited this by cherry-picking data, such as excluding students who transferred or took longer to graduate, to artificially boost their numbers. This not only misled students but also undermined trust in educational institutions as a whole. The FTC’s $100 million settlement with DeVry underscored the severity of such practices and their impact on student decision-making.

To avoid falling victim to graduation rate inflation, prospective students should scrutinize how institutions report their data. Look for rates calculated using the federal government’s standard methodology, which tracks first-time, full-time students over a six-year period. Be wary of claims that seem too good to be true, especially from for-profit institutions with a history of aggressive marketing. Cross-reference statistics with third-party sources like the National Center for Education Statistics or College Scorecard to verify accuracy. Additionally, consider reaching out to current students or alumni for firsthand insights into the actual graduation experience.

The DeVry case serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of prioritizing marketing over transparency. Graduation rate inflation not only harms students who make decisions based on false information but also perpetuates a culture of dishonesty in higher education. Institutions must be held accountable for their claims, and students must arm themselves with the tools to discern fact from fiction. By demanding clarity and rigor in reporting, we can combat this deceptive practice and ensure that educational choices are based on reality, not inflated promises.

Legal Settlements: Details of lawsuits and fines DeVry faced for false advertising claims

DeVry University faced significant legal repercussions for its misleading advertising practices, culminating in high-profile settlements that exposed systemic issues in for-profit education. In 2016, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit against DeVry, alleging the university had deceived prospective students with false claims about graduate employment rates and income levels. The FTC’s investigation revealed that DeVry’s widely publicized statistic—90% of graduates found jobs in their field within six months—was unsupported by evidence. This claim, prominently featured in marketing materials, was a cornerstone of DeVry’s recruitment strategy, targeting individuals seeking better career prospects.

The lawsuit highlighted DeVry’s manipulation of data, including the exclusion of a significant portion of graduates who were unaccounted for in employment surveys. For instance, the university omitted graduates who were unemployed, working part-time, or in jobs unrelated to their degrees. This selective reporting inflated DeVry’s success metrics, creating a false narrative of guaranteed career advancement. The FTC also accused DeVry of overstating the income potential of its graduates, claiming they earned 15% more than peers with bachelor’s degrees from other institutions. This assertion, too, lacked substantiation, as DeVry failed to provide reliable data to back its claims.

In June 2017, DeVry agreed to a $100 million settlement with the FTC, one of the largest ever in an education-related case. The settlement included $49 million in direct refunds to students who enrolled between 2008 and 2015 based on the misleading advertisements. An additional $51 million was allocated for debt forgiveness, targeting students who took out loans to finance their DeVry education. This resolution underscored the FTC’s commitment to holding for-profit institutions accountable for predatory marketing practices that exploit vulnerable populations.

Beyond the FTC settlement, DeVry faced parallel legal challenges from state attorneys general. In 2018, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman secured a $2.25 million settlement, citing DeVry’s deceptive claims about graduate outcomes. Similarly, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey obtained a $2.75 million settlement in 2019, emphasizing DeVry’s failure to provide accurate information to prospective students. These state-level actions complemented federal efforts, creating a multi-front legal battle that forced DeVry to confront its unethical practices.

The DeVry case serves as a cautionary tale for both educational institutions and consumers. For students, it underscores the importance of verifying claims made by colleges, particularly those in the for-profit sector. Prospective enrollees should scrutinize employment and income statistics, seek independent data sources, and consult alumni reviews. For institutions, the settlements highlight the legal and reputational risks of prioritizing enrollment over transparency. DeVry’s downfall illustrates that false advertising not only harms students but also erodes public trust in higher education as a whole.

Frequently asked questions